This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author chris.jerdonek
Recipients chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, pitrou, sandro.tosi, terry.reedy, tshepang
Date 2013-02-25.23:52:01
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1361836322.06.0.391966207613.issue14468@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I still fail to understand what are you trying to achieve.

My goal is to reach consensus on changes and have them committed.  In its current form, I don't agree with the patch.  The length of the comment thread and the length of the patch has discouraged me from raising most of my comments, because I'm fairly certain my comments will lead to back-and-forth discussion which will make the thread even longer.  That's why I want to break things up.

I want to be clear that I'm not against the goals of the patch, so I'm not trying to "block" or stalemate anything.   I just have concerns I would like to discuss which is what the review process is supposed to allow.  Needless to say, I know what it feels like to have a patch reviewed in detail (which I'm not necessarily planning to do).  On the plus side, it's much better than comments being against the patch outright in any form.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-02-25 23:52:02chris.jerdoneksetrecipients: + chris.jerdonek, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, sandro.tosi, tshepang
2013-02-25 23:52:02chris.jerdoneksetmessageid: <1361836322.06.0.391966207613.issue14468@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-02-25 23:52:02chris.jerdoneklinkissue14468 messages
2013-02-25 23:52:01chris.jerdonekcreate