Message179976
For reference, I encountered an issue due to this change and didn't quite understand what was going on. I distilled the problem down and posted a question on stack overflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14300153/why-does-this-datetime-subclass-fail-on-python-3/14324503#14324503
The answer led me here, so now I understand. I wanted to share this use-case for posterity.
I didn't find anything in the "what's new" documents for Python 3.3 or 3.0. Was this fundamental signature change to all objects documented anywhere? Any objection if I draft a change to the docs? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-01-14 21:08:39 | jaraco | set | recipients:
+ jaraco, gvanrossum, georg.brandl, rhettinger, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, jcea, Rhamphoryncus, blakeross, benjamin.peterson, KayEss, jonash |
2013-01-14 21:08:39 | jaraco | set | messageid: <1358197719.48.0.82059947908.issue1683368@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-01-14 21:08:39 | jaraco | link | issue1683368 messages |
2013-01-14 21:08:39 | jaraco | create | |
|