Message179856
> I'm not seeing a good justification for doing anything more, though:
>
> - needing to access this information is an exceedingly niche use case
> - I don't see any way for raw_argv to be useful in a cross-implementation manner.
I expect it to be useful in the "launch (almost) the same command in the
same way" situation.
Not that it happens often :-) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-01-13 10:19:20 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, rhettinger, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, Arfrever, flox, Ben.Darnell, danielsh |
2013-01-13 10:19:20 | pitrou | link | issue14208 messages |
2013-01-13 10:19:19 | pitrou | create | |
|