Author dabeaz
Recipients Ronny.Pfannschmidt, alex, asvetlov, cvrebert, dabeaz, daniel.urban, josmiley, merwok, ncoghlan, torsten, 猫.黒
Date 2013-01-06.20:20:16
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1357503616.56.0.972176154814.issue14965@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Just as a note, there is a distinct possibility that a "property" in a superclass could be some other kind of descriptor object that's not a property.  To handle that case, the solution of

super(self.__class__, self.__class__).x.fset(self, value)

would actually have to be rewritten as

super(self.__class__, self.__class__).x.__set__(self, value)

That said, I agree it would be nice to have a simplified means of accomplishing this.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-01-06 20:20:16dabeazsetrecipients: + dabeaz, ncoghlan, merwok, alex, cvrebert, asvetlov, daniel.urban, torsten, josmiley, Ronny.Pfannschmidt, 猫.黒
2013-01-06 20:20:16dabeazsetmessageid: <1357503616.56.0.972176154814.issue14965@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-01-06 20:20:16dabeazlinkissue14965 messages
2013-01-06 20:20:16dabeazcreate