Message 175840 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	panzi
Recipients	docs@python, orsenthil, panzi, pitrou
Date	2012-11-18.01:31:15
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<50A83A62.5010607@gmx.net>
In-reply-to	<1353195399.15.0.631545740871.issue16423@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
On 11/18/2012 12:36 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > - the patch needs a test (and docs too) > - are you sure ignoring POSTed data is the right thing to do? Shouldn't we forbid it instead? Btw.: The file:// protocol handler also just ignores posted data, so I think the data url handler shouldn't deviate from that. Either both raise an error when data is posted or none.

On 11/18/2012 12:36 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> - the patch needs a test (and docs too)
> - are you sure ignoring POSTed data is the right thing to do? Shouldn't we forbid it instead?

Btw.: The file:// protocol handler also just ignores posted data, so I think the data url handler 
shouldn't deviate from that. Either both raise an error when data is posted or none.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-11-18 01:31:16	panzi	set	recipients: + panzi, orsenthil, pitrou, docs@python
2012-11-18 01:31:15	panzi	link	issue16423 messages
2012-11-18 01:31:15	panzi	create