Message175828
A couple of comments:
- the patch needs a test (and docs too)
- are you sure ignoring POSTed data is the right thing to do? Shouldn't we forbid it instead?
- I think it would be nice to reference the RFC number somewhere
- not sure why you raise IOError on a bad URL; I would say ValueError is the right exception here
+1 on the general idea, by the way. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-11-17 23:36:39 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, orsenthil, panzi, docs@python |
2012-11-17 23:36:39 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1353195399.15.0.631545740871.issue16423@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-11-17 23:36:39 | pitrou | link | issue16423 messages |
2012-11-17 23:36:39 | pitrou | create | |
|