Message175767
The workaround is now documented.
I'm still not sure if this should still be added, or if it should be closed as rejected now that the workaround is documented.
A third option would be adding it as a recipe in the doc, given that the whole functions boils down to a single re.sub (the user can take care of picking the bytes/str regex depending on his input). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-11-17 16:15:05 | ezio.melotti | set | recipients:
+ ezio.melotti, terry.reedy, eric.smith, kveretennicov, eric.araujo, l0nwlf, george.hu, docs@python, maker, Aquinas, Tilka, serhiy.storchaka, a1abhishek |
2012-11-17 16:15:05 | ezio.melotti | set | messageid: <1353168905.37.0.763472479424.issue8402@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-11-17 16:15:05 | ezio.melotti | link | issue8402 messages |
2012-11-17 16:15:05 | ezio.melotti | create | |
|