This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author chris.jerdonek
Recipients asvetlov, chris.jerdonek, ezio.melotti, gregory.p.smith, neologix, pitrou, tim.golden
Date 2012-11-02.21:17:58
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1351891079.01.0.218098995026.issue16353@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Well, the question then becomes whether Popen() shouldn't use the user's default shell instead? :)

That's a good question, too. :)  I was thinking just in terms of supporting the status quo.  Maybe two functions would be useful? (as suggested also by Andrew)

I do think the question of changing Popen()'s behavior should be decided independently of this issue though.  In other words, even if we change Popen() in the future, I think exposing the system default shell would still be worthwhile.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-11-02 21:17:59chris.jerdoneksetrecipients: + chris.jerdonek, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, tim.golden, ezio.melotti, asvetlov, neologix
2012-11-02 21:17:59chris.jerdoneksetmessageid: <1351891079.01.0.218098995026.issue16353@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-11-02 21:17:58chris.jerdoneklinkissue16353 messages
2012-11-02 21:17:58chris.jerdonekcreate