Message173553
Using poll() by default is controversial for 2 reasons, I think:
#1 - a certain slowdown is likely to be introduced (I'll measure it)
#2 - current wait() implementation allows to specify a list of file descriptors and/or Connections objects.
select() can deal with both while poll() does not (it will return a list of integers rather than a list of Connection instances).
I'm not sure how "public" multiprocessing.connection.wait() is considered and how much backward compatibility should matter in this case.
> behaviour might change subtly when the fd becomes > 512
What do you mean? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-10-22 18:31:25 | giampaolo.rodola | set | recipients:
+ giampaolo.rodola, pitrou, vstinner, jnoller, synapse, asksol, dmalcolm, danken, Erez.Sh, sbt, William.Edwards |
2012-10-22 18:31:25 | giampaolo.rodola | set | messageid: <1350930685.73.0.415118322872.issue10527@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-10-22 18:31:25 | giampaolo.rodola | link | issue10527 messages |
2012-10-22 18:31:25 | giampaolo.rodola | create | |
|