➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Want to Delete This Account
Recipients Arfrever, Ramchandra Apte, Want to Delete This Account, gpolo
Date 2012-10-18.04:55:11
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAExgZOifKPifLH+7wu7tBgMRJxhOpCvXtB+i+NogLS-MkALVmg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1350497765.87.0.914034657546.issue16248@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
On 17 October 2012 23:46, Guilherme Polo <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Guilherme Polo added the comment:
>
> It is a well known fact that the readprofile function uses exec, and it
> has been like that for more than 18 years. The parameters baseName and
> className defines the execution of the files $HOME/.{className}.tcl,
> $HOME/.{className}.py, $HOME/.{baseName}.tcl, and $HOME/.{baseName}.py. The
> function's docstring actually say that.
>
> Said that, I never needed to load custom code during the creation of a Tk
> instance. To me the existence of readprofile is unneeded.
>
> But what is your proposal to the issue ?
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16248>
> _______________________________________
>

Simply remove the readprofile code (it is not documented and I never had to
use it)
History
Date User Action Args
2012-10-18 04:55:11Want to Delete This Accountsetrecipients: + Want to Delete This Account, gpolo, Arfrever, Ramchandra Apte
2012-10-18 04:55:11Want to Delete This Accountlinkissue16248 messages
2012-10-18 04:55:11Want to Delete This Accountcreate