Message171785
> The unlock operation is the same, so now you have to arbitrarily pick one
> of the "lockd" and chose release().
That depends on the implementation. In the three implementations on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers-writers_problem
the unlock operateration is different for readers and writers.
> Why take a construct which is essentially a lock that can be acquired in two
> different ways and force people to view it as separate objects?
I don't see why writing
lock.exclusive.acquire()
really requires a different way of thinking compared to writing
lock.exclusive_acquire()
or
lock.acquire_exclusive() |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-10-02 10:59:55 | sbt | set | recipients:
+ sbt, pitrou, kristjan.jonsson, christian.heimes, jyasskin, asvetlov, neologix, mklauber, Sebastian.Noack |
2012-10-02 10:59:55 | sbt | set | messageid: <1349175595.63.0.761929152847.issue8800@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-10-02 10:59:55 | sbt | link | issue8800 messages |
2012-10-02 10:59:55 | sbt | create | |
|