Message171077
Well, "other" surrogates will cause a different error later than with the current _has_surrogates logic, but it won't be any more mysterious than what would happen now, I think. Normally, if I understand correctly, other surrogates should never occur, so I don't think it is a real issue.
Yes, lone '?'s should not stop the pattern match in an encoded string. Even though I don't think they are normally supposed to occur, they do occur when encoded words are encoded incorrectly, and we get a better error recovery result if we look for ?= as the end. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-09-23 19:06:14 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, loewis, barry, orsenthil, nadeem.vawda, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, rosslagerwall, serhiy.storchaka |
2012-09-23 19:06:14 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1348427174.77.0.656591616199.issue11454@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-09-23 19:06:14 | r.david.murray | link | issue11454 messages |
2012-09-23 19:06:14 | r.david.murray | create | |
|