➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients Arfrever, loewis, ned.deily, r.david.murray, tpievila
Date 2012-09-09.20:06:07
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1347221167.74.0.498810222532.issue15890@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
It occurs to me that ignoring the user's selected umask could be considered a bug by some people.  A package manager for a distribution should presumably ensure the correct umask during install, but if a user is doing a direct install, it seems reasonable to think they are responsible for setting the umask they want used.  There is a fuzzy line here, though, because distutils is also a bit of a package manager...

Regardless, though, Ned's observation seems to indicate this is not a regression.  Tomi, do you find a different behavior in 3.2?
History
Date User Action Args
2012-09-09 20:06:07r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, loewis, ned.deily, Arfrever, tpievila
2012-09-09 20:06:07r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1347221167.74.0.498810222532.issue15890@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-09-09 20:06:07r.david.murraylinkissue15890 messages
2012-09-09 20:06:07r.david.murraycreate