Message168976
Revised patch yet again to instead speak of "non-object, non-array" values and "JSON null, boolean, number, or string" values.
Re: Petri, the patch already mentions the specific parameters one can use to get stricter behavior, albeit not in that particular short paragraph. Feel free to edit the patch.
Any hope of getting this applied soon-ish? I began drafting this over 3 months ago, and yet this issue is tagged "easy"... |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-08-24 07:34:57 | cvrebert | set | recipients:
+ cvrebert, georg.brandl, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, docs@python, petri.lehtinen, serhiy.storchaka |
2012-08-24 07:34:55 | cvrebert | set | messageid: <1345793695.77.0.414329921203.issue14674@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-08-24 07:34:55 | cvrebert | link | issue14674 messages |
2012-08-24 07:34:54 | cvrebert | create | |
|