Message 166074 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	brian.curtin, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, michael.foord, ocean-city, pitrou, r.david.murray, terry.reedy
Date	2012-07-21.21:30:03
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1342906090.19457.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to	<1342905661.91.0.286121759553.issue10652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> I wonder if it would be sensible to have test___all__ restore the > state of sys.modules after it runs. Probably not. I don't think we want to debug the consequences of having duplicate modules lying around by way of old references registered here and there.

> I wonder if it would be sensible to have test___all__ restore the
> state of sys.modules after it runs.

Probably not. I don't think we want to debug the consequences of having
duplicate modules lying around by way of old references registered here
and there.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-07-21 21:30:04	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, ocean-city, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin
2012-07-21 21:30:03	pitrou	link	issue10652 messages
2012-07-21 21:30:03	pitrou	create