Message164179
> IMO adding follow_symlinks to the functions currently supporting symlinks/followlinks is a bugfix. Such a patch would be ok to go into 3.3.
Here is an other patch, that implements Larry's suggestion about
renaming followlinks in (f)walk to follow_symlinks (with keeping old
name as alias). I hope native speakers corrected me in docs. However, I
don't think that this is the best solution (but it better than nothing). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-06-27 17:57:45 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, georg.brandl, larry, Arfrever, r.david.murray, hynek |
2012-06-27 17:57:44 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue15202 messages |
2012-06-27 17:57:43 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |
|