Message164173
> I dislike "followlinks" because "links" is ambiguous; both hard links
> and soft links are "links", but it's only modifying behavior regarding
> one of them.
Technically, in Unix world any file is a hard link. It is impossible to
distinguish a hard link from the "original", they are completely equal.
So I don't think that there will be a ambiguity, what links are implied,
especially, if the documentation is clearly says "symbolic links".
> I therefore suggest that function arguments are most similar to "method names and instance variables"--after all, they *are* instance variables.
Technically, they are local variables.
> "followlinks" is comprised of two words but they are not separated by underscores.
As "getgrouplist" or "sendfile". What about such argument names as
"filename" and "newline"? If being a consistent in that, then it must be
"follow_symbolic_links". And "source_directory_file_descriptor" instead
"src_dir_fd".
> It might actually be nice to clarify PEP 8 on this.
I agree.
> I'm glad you think it's an improvement--we can certainly agree on that!
Of course. This is the issue, for the solution of which I registered
here. All other issues and patches were just distractions and
practice. ;-) I am grateful to you. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-06-27 17:02:58 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, georg.brandl, larry, Arfrever, r.david.murray, hynek |
2012-06-27 17:02:57 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue15202 messages |
2012-06-27 17:02:56 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |
|