This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jcea
Recipients Sam.Rushing, eric.araujo, jcea, nadeem.vawda
Date 2012-06-19.18:21:04
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1340130065.74.0.655611823601.issue14684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
So my question is easy: could we apply this patch as is and defer any "improvement" to 3.4?. The risk of not doing so would be to miss 3.3 completely.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-06-19 18:21:06jceasetrecipients: + jcea, nadeem.vawda, eric.araujo, Sam.Rushing
2012-06-19 18:21:05jceasetmessageid: <1340130065.74.0.655611823601.issue14684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-06-19 18:21:05jcealinkissue14684 messages
2012-06-19 18:21:04jceacreate