Message162582
> What is the use case for passing a string subclass to charmap_decode? Or in other words, how did you stumble upon the bug?
I stumbled upon it, rewriting the charmap decoder (issue14874). Now
charmap decoder processes the two cases -- a more effective case of
string table and a general slower case of general mapping. I proposed a
more optimized case of 256-character UCS2 string (covers all standard
charmap encodings). If processing general strings and maps was
consistent, these cases can be merged. A string subclass is just an
example that illustrates the inconsistency. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-06-10 10:51:16 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, lemburg, loewis, doerwalter, eric.araujo |
2012-06-10 10:51:16 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue14850 messages |
2012-06-10 10:51:16 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |
|