Message162001
Interesting - it turns out we can't fully reproduce the behaviour of nested with statements in ExitStack (see the new reference test I checked in, as well as #14969)
I added one technically redundant variable to the implementation to make it more obviously correct to the reader, as well as a test that ensures the stack can handle ridiculous numbers of callbacks without failing (a key advantage of using a single frame rather than one frame per callback)
While it isn't mandatory, we prefer it if contributors submit Contributor Agreements even for small changes. If you're happy to do that, I consider emailing a scanned or digitally photographed copy of the signed form as described here to be the simplest currently available approach: http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/ |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-05-31 14:08:40 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, alonho, python-dev |
2012-05-31 14:08:40 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1338473320.21.0.199987745598.issue14963@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-05-31 14:08:39 | ncoghlan | link | issue14963 messages |
2012-05-31 14:08:39 | ncoghlan | create | |
|