Message161673
> > RawValue uses ctypes, right? That's problematic for platforms which don't
> > support ctypes.
>
> Are there many posix systems (we care about) where ctypes doesn't
> work?
It depends what you call "caring about" :-)
But proprietary Unix C compilers generally don't mix very well with
ctypes.
> It would be fairly easy to use memoryview instead of ctypes. (In fact
> Value/RawValue could be implemented that way when using a typecode
> instead of a ctypes type.)
That would be a good idea then. Also, not using ctypes could make code
theoretically more robust. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-05-26 17:56:22 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, anacrolix, neologix, sbt |
2012-05-26 17:56:20 | pitrou | link | issue14059 messages |
2012-05-26 17:56:20 | pitrou | create | |
|