Message161470
> So what are you suggesting? That a lock of the default type should
> raise an error if you try to acquire it when it has been acquired in a
> previous process?
I was suggesting a way to make 'logging' fork-safe. No more, no less.
Does what my previous comment make sense in light of this?
> Using a generation count
Sure, that's a good idea. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-05-23 23:39:44 | lesha | set | recipients:
+ lesha, gregory.p.smith, vinay.sajip, jcea, pitrou, vstinner, nirai, bobbyi, neologix, Giovanni.Bajo, sdaoden, sbt, avian |
2012-05-23 23:39:44 | lesha | set | messageid: <1337816384.1.0.986422970832.issue6721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-05-23 23:39:43 | lesha | link | issue6721 messages |
2012-05-23 23:39:43 | lesha | create | |
|