Message161425
> I had a thought about untracking tuples. If a tuple contains only
> immutable objects (atomics and tuples of atomics etc), then it should
> be untracked. Once untracked, it will never need to be tracked again
> since the tuple is immutable. If a tuple contains mutable objects, it
> will always need to be tracked.
True. However, some tuples may be in an unfinished state (they are being
built up internally and a GC collection occurred in the middle).
> I was wondering whether it is possible to determine whether a tuple
> needs to be tracked or not the first time it appears in generation 0 -
> tuples in older generations would then not need to be considered.
I'm not sure that would make much of a difference in practice. Most
tuples are very short, so checking them for untracking should be
reasonably fast. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-05-23 15:46:20 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, stw |
2012-05-23 15:46:19 | pitrou | link | issue14775 messages |
2012-05-23 15:46:19 | pitrou | create | |
|