Message160104
I think it's beyond a hint and says we need to find a solution or else other people will run into similar issues.
And while I'm thinking about it, there is precedent for exposing modules under a different name than they are actually installed as in the system (e.g. os.path is posixpath), so I don't think we need to bend over backwards to mask every detail if the bootstrap solution is not taken (e.g. if we decided to just paper over _frozen_importlib we don't need to iterate over _frozen_importlib.__dict__ and patch up __module__). But I do think that we need to choose some solution to prevent this "forking" of code in the running interpreter. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-05-06 19:05:06 | brett.cannon | set | recipients:
+ brett.cannon, lemburg, ncoghlan, pitrou, eric.smith, eric.araujo, Arfrever, python-dev, eric.snow |
2012-05-06 19:05:06 | brett.cannon | set | messageid: <1336331106.6.0.0390815701026.issue14657@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-05-06 19:05:06 | brett.cannon | link | issue14657 messages |
2012-05-06 19:05:05 | brett.cannon | create | |
|