Message157254
But the sleep(0.1) forces a thread switch so I consider that still cheating -- nobody in their right mind would consider calling sleep() inside __hash__.
You can probably get it to fail without this by just doing a bunch of random computation in the __hash__ (and using a low sys.setswitchinterval() value). Or consider creating a key that consists of e.g. a tuple of 100 or 1000 Key instances -- hashing that will call the __hash__ on each of those, wasting a lot of cycles. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-04-01 04:00:02 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, gregory.p.smith, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, Arfrever, r.david.murray, asvetlov, skrah, Jim.Jewett |
2012-04-01 04:00:02 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1333252802.42.0.271694929012.issue14417@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-04-01 04:00:01 | gvanrossum | link | issue14417 messages |
2012-04-01 04:00:01 | gvanrossum | create | |
|