This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients Jim.Jewett, eric.snow, gvanrossum, r.david.murray, rhettinger, vstinner
Date 2012-03-25.23:32:38
SpamBayes Score 7.0379997e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1332718359.14.0.986981909085.issue14386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I believe it was actually Guido who suggested exposing dict_proxy, in response to Victor (but independent of Victor's needs, if I understood the message correctly).

It has always seemed odd to me ("always" referring my time working with Python3, of course) that a class that implements the mapping protocol has no way to return the same type of objects that real dict methods do.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-03-25 23:32:39r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, gvanrossum, rhettinger, vstinner, eric.snow, Jim.Jewett
2012-03-25 23:32:39r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1332718359.14.0.986981909085.issue14386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-03-25 23:32:38r.david.murraylinkissue14386 messages
2012-03-25 23:32:38r.david.murraycreate