Message156007
I'm not sure what tests break or why, I suppose it is the ones for the security patch. I'm not sure which code you are referring to... the code in msg122259 I tested only cursorily, the (different) code in issue 13893 is what I'm running today, and so has been tested more heavily, but I haven't run the regression tests (haven't figured out how).
The latter code fixes the _url_collapse_path_split function, instead of working around it, which the code in msg122259 tries to do.
I would be highly interested if it fails any tests, and why, and would be glad to help analyze and fix. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-03-16 07:51:40 | v+python | set | recipients:
+ v+python, fdrake, facundobatista, orsenthil, Giovanni.Funchal |
2012-03-16 07:51:40 | v+python | set | messageid: <1331884300.7.0.957675818233.issue10484@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-03-16 07:51:40 | v+python | link | issue10484 messages |
2012-03-16 07:51:39 | v+python | create | |
|