➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author skrah
Recipients Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, Jim.Jewett, Ramchandra Apte, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, casevh, ced, eric.smith, eric.snow, jjconti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, vstinner
Date 2012-03-07.12:29:09
SpamBayes Score 0.00010462775
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <20120307122909.GB4311@sleipnir.bytereef.org>
In-reply-to <1331093383.53.0.464429203652.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
Benjamin Peterson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Speaking of inline, the "inline" keyword will have to go because it's not C89.

Do you happen to know a free compiler that builds Python but does not
understand "inline"? I'm asking because without testing you can never
really be sure:

For example I added support for compilers without uint64_t, but
all major compilers (gcc, suncc, icc, VS) of course have uint64_t.

Then I finally found CompCert, and discovered that a couple of
things were missing in the headers.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-03-07 12:29:10skrahsetrecipients: + skrah, lemburg, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, casevh, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, jjconti, ced, Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, eric.snow, Ramchandra Apte, Jim.Jewett
2012-03-07 12:29:10skrahlinkissue7652 messages
2012-03-07 12:29:09skrahcreate