Author lemburg
Recipients Arach, Arfrever, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, Mark.Shannon, PaulMcMillan, Zhiping.Deng, alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, eric.snow, fx5, georg.brandl, grahamd, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, gz, haypo, jcea, lemburg, loewis, mark.dickinson, merwok, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, skorgu, skrah, terry.reedy, tim.peters, v+python, zbysz
Date 2012-02-21.09:50:25
SpamBayes Score 0.000212768
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4F4368DB.80706@egenix.com>
In-reply-to <CAMpsgwYwYv+T_uNF1DeOSRttqrjGowKiFP5_kCBrUY9S3EKp+g@mail.gmail.com>
Content
STINNER Victor wrote:
> 
> STINNER Victor <victor.stinner@gmail.com> added the comment:
> 
>> Question: Should sys.flags.hash_randomization be True (1) when PYTHONHASHSEED=0?  It is now.
>>
>> Saying yes "working as intended" is fine by me.
> 
> It is documented that PYTHONHASHSEED=0 disables the randomization, so
> sys.flags.hash_randomization must be False (0).

PYTHONHASHSEED=1 will disable randomization as well :-)

Only setting PYTHONHASHSEED=random actually enables randomization.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-02-21 09:50:26lemburgsetrecipients: + lemburg, gvanrossum, tim.peters, loewis, barry, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, haypo, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, merwok, grahamd, Arfrever, v+python, alex, zbysz, skrah, dmalcolm, gz, neologix, Arach, Mark.Shannon, python-dev, eric.snow, Zhiping.Deng, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, PaulMcMillan, fx5, skorgu
2012-02-21 09:50:25lemburglinkissue13703 messages
2012-02-21 09:50:25lemburgcreate