Author haypo
Recipients Arach, Arfrever, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, Mark.Shannon, PaulMcMillan, Zhiping.Deng, alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, eric.snow, fx5, georg.brandl, grahamd, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, gz, haypo, jcea, lemburg, loewis, mark.dickinson, merwok, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, skorgu, skrah, terry.reedy, tim.peters, v+python, zbysz
Date 2012-02-21.09:47:32
SpamBayes Score 0.0164047
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <CAMpsgwYwYv+T_uNF1DeOSRttqrjGowKiFP5_kCBrUY9S3EKp+g@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1329806431.93.0.448943602188.issue13703@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Question: Should sys.flags.hash_randomization be True (1) when PYTHONHASHSEED=0?  It is now.
>
> Saying yes "working as intended" is fine by me.

It is documented that PYTHONHASHSEED=0 disables the randomization, so
sys.flags.hash_randomization must be False (0).
History
Date User Action Args
2012-02-21 09:47:32hayposetrecipients: + haypo, lemburg, gvanrossum, tim.peters, loewis, barry, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, merwok, grahamd, Arfrever, v+python, alex, zbysz, skrah, dmalcolm, gz, neologix, Arach, Mark.Shannon, python-dev, eric.snow, Zhiping.Deng, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, PaulMcMillan, fx5, skorgu
2012-02-21 09:47:32haypolinkissue13703 messages
2012-02-21 09:47:32haypocreate