This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients orsenthil, r.david.murray, zulla
Date 2012-02-17.02:05:52
SpamBayes Score 2.7475646e-09
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1329444353.41.0.604190883527.issue14036@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
It's not a patch if it is the whole file.  A diff would be much more useful, since then we could see the changes easily.

This kind of change would require a bit of discussion.  I'm doubtful that it would be applied as a bug fix, and we might even want the validation to be optional and not the default.  Part of the issue is that urlparse was originally based on the older standards, as you can see from the docstring.

You may find others to agree with you, but personally it doesn't look to me like this rises to the level of a security issue.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-02-17 02:05:53r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, orsenthil, zulla
2012-02-17 02:05:53r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1329444353.41.0.604190883527.issue14036@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-02-17 02:05:52r.david.murraylinkissue14036 messages
2012-02-17 02:05:52r.david.murraycreate