➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients jcon, kristjan.jonsson, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, paul.moore, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, pv, rupole, skrah, teoliphant, vstinner
Date 2012-01-28.17:29:11
SpamBayes Score 6.2108693e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1327771617.8904.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1327771158.38.0.886998726481.issue10181@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
> Nick Coghlan <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> > Radical suggestion: make it public as collections.simple_ndarray?
> 
> Heh, that's a nice one. :)

Well, the question is: does it have a point? Is this ndarray useful
outside of any third-party infrastructure such as the APIs offered by
numpy?

You might answer that we already have array.array but ISTM that
array.array is quite useless in general :)
History
Date User Action Args
2012-01-28 17:29:12pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, teoliphant, paul.moore, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, rupole, kristjan.jonsson, vstinner, pv, skrah, jcon, petri.lehtinen
2012-01-28 17:29:12pitroulinkissue10181 messages
2012-01-28 17:29:11pitroucreate