Author fx5
Recipients Arach, Arfrever, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, Mark.Shannon, PaulMcMillan, Zhiping.Deng, alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, eric.snow, fx5, georg.brandl, grahamd, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, gz, haypo, jcea, lemburg, mark.dickinson, merwok, neologix, pitrou, skrah, terry.reedy, tim.peters, v+python, zbysz
Date 2012-01-20.09:30:41
SpamBayes Score 0.000233243
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1327051841.74.0.786264271225.issue13703@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> They may be non-orderable, but since they are required to be hashable,
> I guess one can build an comparison function with the following:

Since we are are trying to fix a problem where hash(X) == hash(Y), you
can't make them orderable by using the hash-values and build a binary
out of the (equal) hash-values.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-01-20 09:30:41fx5setrecipients: + fx5, lemburg, gvanrossum, tim.peters, barry, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, haypo, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, merwok, grahamd, Arfrever, v+python, alex, zbysz, skrah, dmalcolm, gz, neologix, Arach, Mark.Shannon, eric.snow, Zhiping.Deng, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, PaulMcMillan
2012-01-20 09:30:41fx5setmessageid: <1327051841.74.0.786264271225.issue13703@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-01-20 09:30:41fx5linkissue13703 messages
2012-01-20 09:30:41fx5create