Message151668
I'm -1 on this patch for essentially the same reasons as Charles-François. It introduces a lot of code (and hacks!) in critical pathways of the interpreter. Someone would have to be constantly maintaining and testing it. In return, what do we get? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-01-20 03:31:20 | benjamin.peterson | set | recipients:
+ benjamin.peterson, loewis, rhettinger, jcea, ronaldoussoren, belopolsky, pitrou, wsanchez, movement, techtonik, serverhorror, glyph, laca, twleung, jbaker, robert.kern, sirg3, danchr, dhduvall, dmalcolm, mjw, Garen, neologix, lasizoillo, fche, hazmat, jmcp, scox |
2012-01-20 03:31:20 | benjamin.peterson | set | messageid: <1327030280.55.0.114900630123.issue13405@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-01-20 03:31:19 | benjamin.peterson | link | issue13405 messages |
2012-01-20 03:31:19 | benjamin.peterson | create | |
|