Author lemburg
Recipients Arach, Arfrever, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Mark.Shannon, PaulMcMillan, Zhiping.Deng, alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, gz, haypo, jcea, lemburg, mark.dickinson, merwok, pitrou, skrah, terry.reedy, tim.peters, v+python, zbysz
Date 2012-01-11.17:38:09
SpamBayes Score 2.06441e-10
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4F0DC8FB.8050909@egenix.com>
In-reply-to <1326303273.14.0.0974032239331.issue13703@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Mark Dickinson wrote:
> 
> Mark Dickinson <dickinsm@gmail.com> added the comment:
> 
> [Antoine]
>> Also, how about false positives? Having legitimate programs break
>> because of legitimate data would be a disaster.
> 
> This worries me, too.
> 
> [MAL]
>> Yes, which is why the patch should be disabled by default (using
>> an env var) in dot-releases.
> 
> Are you proposing having it enabled by default in Python 3.3?

Possibly, yes. Depends on whether anyone comes up with a problem in
the alpha, beta, RC release cycle.

It would be great to have the universal hash method approach for
Python 3.3. That way Python could self-heal itself in case it
finds too many collisions. My guess is that it's still better
to raise an exception, though, since it would uncover either
attacks or programming errors.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-01-11 17:38:10lemburgsetrecipients: + lemburg, gvanrossum, tim.peters, barry, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, haypo, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, merwok, Arfrever, v+python, alex, zbysz, skrah, dmalcolm, gz, Arach, Mark.Shannon, Zhiping.Deng, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, PaulMcMillan
2012-01-11 17:38:10lemburglinkissue13703 messages
2012-01-11 17:38:09lemburgcreate