➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author lemburg
Recipients Arfrever, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Mark.Shannon, PaulMcMillan, Zhiping.Deng, alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, jcea, lemburg, pitrou, terry.reedy, v+python, vstinner
Date 2012-01-06.17:03:08
SpamBayes Score 4.7927057e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4F072943.8090603@egenix.com>
In-reply-to <CAMpsgwbMEe4zmsbkDL-iZGrErut7g-bsYamc5RHWkTuBWy8_CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content 
STINNER Victor wrote:
> 
> STINNER Victor <victor.stinner@haypocalc.com> added the comment:
> 
> hash-attack.patch does never decrement the collision counter.

Why should it ? It's only used as local variable in the lookup function.

Note that the limit only triggers on a per-key basis. It's not
a limit on the total number of collisions in the table, so you don't
need to keep the number of collisions stored on the object.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-01-06 17:03:08lemburgsetrecipients: + lemburg, gvanrossum, barry, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, jcea, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, Arfrever, v+python, alex, dmalcolm, Mark.Shannon, Zhiping.Deng, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, PaulMcMillan
2012-01-06 17:03:08lemburglinkissue13703 messages
2012-01-06 17:03:08lemburgcreate