Message150723
Le vendredi 06 janvier 2012 à 02:18 +0000, Phill a écrit :
> Phill <beerb0x@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Rather than listening on a socket, listening on a named pipe
>
> eg:
> address = (r'\\.\pipe\Test', 'AF_PIPE')
> listener = Listener(*address)
> conn = listener.accept()
>
> It doesnt raise an exception when i run the script again a second time.
According to MSDN, this is normal:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365150%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
However, there's also a flag named FILE_FLAG_FIRST_PIPE_INSTANCE that we
could use in PipeListener, which would then raise an error if a listener
pipe was created a second time. It would probably make more sense,
although I don't know whether some programs may rely on creating a pipe
multiple times. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-01-06 12:30:38 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, jnoller, news1234, neologix, BreamoreBoy, gearb0x |
2012-01-06 12:30:37 | pitrou | link | issue8184 messages |
2012-01-06 12:30:37 | pitrou | create | |
|