This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author meador.inge
Recipients loewis, meador.inge
Date 2011-12-19.00:53:09
SpamBayes Score 0.00029424005
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1324255989.7.0.533302860937.issue13629@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Is there a reason not to renumber token.h?

I thought about that, but at the time I wasn't sure whether or not that
would break anything.  I went with the current patch because it is lower
risk.

On the other hand, proper clients of token.h should only be using the macros and should have no knowledge of the numeric codes.  If they do use the numeric codes directly somehow, then that is their issue.  So, I guess it is OK to renumber token.h.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-12-19 00:53:09meador.ingesetrecipients: + meador.inge, loewis
2011-12-19 00:53:09meador.ingesetmessageid: <1324255989.7.0.533302860937.issue13629@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-12-19 00:53:09meador.ingelinkissue13629 messages
2011-12-19 00:53:09meador.ingecreate