Message 147166 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	doko, exarkun, lekma, loewis, neologix, nvetoshkin, pitrou, socketpair, vstinner
Date	2011-11-06.17:54:05
SpamBayes Score	0.00015350826
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1320602045.92.0.575267475925.issue10115@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> What value should we assign to sock->sock_timeout if SOCK_NONBLOCK was > specified in accept4() call? The same value as for other non-blocking sockets, IMO. > And in socket.py should we check as in original accept: > if getdefaulttimeout() is None and self.gettimeout(): > sock.setblocking(True) I don't think so, since the whole point of accept4() is to override normal flags creation.

> What value should we assign to sock->sock_timeout if SOCK_NONBLOCK was 
> specified in accept4() call?

The same value as for other non-blocking sockets, IMO.

> And in socket.py should we check as in original accept:
> if getdefaulttimeout() is None and self.gettimeout():
>    sock.setblocking(True)

I don't think so, since the whole point of accept4() is to override normal flags creation.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-11-06 17:54:06	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, loewis, doko, exarkun, vstinner, lekma, nvetoshkin, neologix, socketpair
2011-11-06 17:54:05	pitrou	set	messageid: <1320602045.92.0.575267475925.issue10115@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-11-06 17:54:05	pitrou	link	issue10115 messages
2011-11-06 17:54:05	pitrou	create