Message144483
One changeset per issue is a general goal. So is the ability to review patches. Sometime people forget to add a News or Acks entry and have to followup with an addendum. (Mark's patch still lack that, for instance.) Sometimes a patch is so large that a reviewer asks or requires splitting. In this case, each patch is large enough and touches enough files (up to 10 I think) that two is plausible. What would not be appreciated by either a reviewer or commit-list recipients would be one patch file per patched file. That would be a patch bomb indeed ;-) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-09-24 02:36:45 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, ezio.melotti, alex, meador.inge |
2011-09-24 02:36:45 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1316831805.14.0.86000360703.issue13012@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-09-24 02:36:44 | terry.reedy | link | issue13012 messages |
2011-09-24 02:36:44 | terry.reedy | create | |
|