Message144260
My long-ago memory is that 'should not' is slightly looser in w3c parlance than 'must not'. However, it is a moot point if we decide to follow the 'should' in 3.3 for the default 'strict' mode, which both Ezio and I think we 'should' ;-). Our 'errors' parameter makes it easy to request something else, but it has to be explicit. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-09-19 01:23:36 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, lemburg, gvanrossum, pitrou, vstinner, jkloth, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, Arfrever, v+python, r.david.murray, abacabadabacaba, tchrist |
2011-09-19 01:23:35 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1316395415.93.0.0472611881591.issue12729@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-09-19 01:23:35 | terry.reedy | link | issue12729 messages |
2011-09-19 01:23:34 | terry.reedy | create | |
|