Author jonforums
Recipients alexis, jonforums, merwok, rubenvb, schmir, tarek
Date 2011-07-27.21:38:18
SpamBayes Score 5.74489e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1311802699.08.0.520263963462.issue12641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
should the question be "what's the first mingw gcc version that -mno-cygwin usage unnecessary" rather than finding the first version the option was removed?

and, does it matter whether you're building on win for win, or cross compiling for win from nix?

sadly, i don't know gcc internals but a post to the mingw and/or mingw-w64 ml's should get the right people weighing in.

btw, can distutils do a lightweight configure-like check for feature presence rather than going a gcc version check?
History
Date User Action Args
2011-07-27 21:38:19jonforumssetrecipients: + jonforums, schmir, tarek, merwok, rubenvb, alexis
2011-07-27 21:38:19jonforumssetmessageid: <1311802699.08.0.520263963462.issue12641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-07-27 21:38:18jonforumslinkissue12641 messages
2011-07-27 21:38:18jonforumscreate