Message 141277 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	jonforums
Recipients	alexis, eric.araujo, jonforums, rubenvb, schmir, tarek
Date	2011-07-27.21:38:18
SpamBayes Score	5.744888e-07
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1311802699.08.0.520263963462.issue12641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
should the question be "what's the first mingw gcc version that -mno-cygwin usage unnecessary" rather than finding the first version the option was removed? and, does it matter whether you're building on win for win, or cross compiling for win from nix? sadly, i don't know gcc internals but a post to the mingw and/or mingw-w64 ml's should get the right people weighing in. btw, can distutils do a lightweight configure-like check for feature presence rather than going a gcc version check?

should the question be "what's the first mingw gcc version that -mno-cygwin usage unnecessary" rather than finding the first version the option was removed?

and, does it matter whether you're building on win for win, or cross compiling for win from nix?

sadly, i don't know gcc internals but a post to the mingw and/or mingw-w64 ml's should get the right people weighing in.

btw, can distutils do a lightweight configure-like check for feature presence rather than going a gcc version check?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-07-27 21:38:19	jonforums	set	recipients: + jonforums, schmir, tarek, eric.araujo, rubenvb, alexis
2011-07-27 21:38:19	jonforums	set	messageid: <1311802699.08.0.520263963462.issue12641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-07-27 21:38:18	jonforums	link	issue12641 messages
2011-07-27 21:38:18	jonforums	create