This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author underrun
Recipients asksol, jnoller, ryles, underrun
Date 2011-06-17.04:39:58
SpamBayes Score 2.5029552e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1308285600.02.0.43861803235.issue6056@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I was wrong about exit behavior of a process that has put to a queue -- it seems to behave as expected. i had been playing with a proxy to a queue rather than a queue (to which, if you put, the process can exit right away because the actual put happens in the process that owns the queue).

I think this works as intended, but lmk. Also, I haven't really played with the tests that much, so that bit could use some review. It hasn't broken anything in any of my real world tests though.

Also, have I mentioned that the multiprocessing module is amazing? Cause it is. I sort of feel like antigravity == multiprocessing ...
History
Date User Action Args
2011-06-17 04:40:00underrunsetrecipients: + underrun, jnoller, ryles, asksol
2011-06-17 04:40:00underrunsetmessageid: <1308285600.02.0.43861803235.issue6056@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-06-17 04:39:59underrunlinkissue6056 messages
2011-06-17 04:39:58underruncreate