Message137655
Mark Dickinson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Here's a patch. Stefan, could you please review?
Mark, sorry for not replying earlier. The patch looks great.
I've also tested the patch in practice: I ran 700,000,000 random tests with
an exponent range of [-999999999, 999999999]. This took three days.
Without the patch, this would have been impossible; the range had to be
restricted to [-9999, 9999].
Unfortunately I got sidetracked reviewing the rest of the function (today
I started out on a mechanical proof of the nth-root part).
I *did* review the changes though, and I think they are correct. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-06-04 17:59:58 | skrah | set | recipients:
+ skrah, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, vstinner, python-dev |
2011-06-04 17:59:48 | skrah | link | issue12080 messages |
2011-06-04 17:59:48 | skrah | create | |
|