Message137479
I have a use case where I have a small library of setup_hook functions for various purposes that are used by multiple projects. Some projects may want to use more than one of these setup_hooks.
I can certainly create a wrapper hook for each function that calls all the necessary hooks. But that gets a little tedious and seems unnecessary. In this use case it would be fine if I could just list a set of setup_hooks to be executed in sequence.
It is, of course, up the developer to be sure that none of these setup_hooks have conflicting actions.
As a temporary workaround I wrote a setup_hook called chain_setup_hooks. I then looks for an option called "setup_hooks" which behaves as I've described. This works fine, though I don't see why setup_hook shouldn't allow multiple values to begin with. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-06-02 14:59:39 | erik.bray | set | recipients:
+ erik.bray, tarek, eric.araujo, alexis |
2011-06-02 14:59:39 | erik.bray | set | messageid: <1307026779.27.0.653754848212.issue12240@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-06-02 14:59:38 | erik.bray | link | issue12240 messages |
2011-06-02 14:59:38 | erik.bray | create | |
|