This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rosslagerwall
Recipients gregory.p.smith, neologix, pitrou, rosslagerwall, vstinner
Date 2011-05-28.11:33:26
SpamBayes Score 4.8509683e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1306582407.36.0.603752661902.issue12196@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
>> Also, the pure python implementation of subprocess for posix can now >> be updated to use pipe2 if it exists (previously on _posixsubprocess.c
>> used it).

> I don't understand the last part :-)
> What do you suggest?

Perhaps, os.pipe2 can be used if available, then a modified version of _posixsubprocess.cloexec_pipe without the check for pipe2 could be used as a fallback.

I'm not sure why there exists both a python and c implementation.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-05-28 11:33:27rosslagerwallsetrecipients: + rosslagerwall, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, neologix
2011-05-28 11:33:27rosslagerwallsetmessageid: <1306582407.36.0.603752661902.issue12196@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-05-28 11:33:26rosslagerwalllinkissue12196 messages
2011-05-28 11:33:26rosslagerwallcreate