Message137122
>> Also, the pure python implementation of subprocess for posix can now >> be updated to use pipe2 if it exists (previously on _posixsubprocess.c
>> used it).
> I don't understand the last part :-)
> What do you suggest?
Perhaps, os.pipe2 can be used if available, then a modified version of _posixsubprocess.cloexec_pipe without the check for pipe2 could be used as a fallback.
I'm not sure why there exists both a python and c implementation. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-05-28 11:33:27 | rosslagerwall | set | recipients:
+ rosslagerwall, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, neologix |
2011-05-28 11:33:27 | rosslagerwall | set | messageid: <1306582407.36.0.603752661902.issue12196@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-05-28 11:33:26 | rosslagerwall | link | issue12196 messages |
2011-05-28 11:33:26 | rosslagerwall | create | |
|