Message136688
On Mon 23 May 2011, Gergely Kálmán wrote:
> It's been a while I had a look at that code. As far as I remember though
> the code is fairly decent not
> taking the missing unit tests into account. There are a few todos, and
> also a pretty bad bug that I've fixed
> but not committed. The TODOs include better parsing of auxiliary data,
> support for scatter-gather, addressed
> messages. If you wish I can send you the latest patch that has the bug
> fixed and applies to 3.2.
Erm, have you seen the separately-implemented patch I posted at
http://bugs.python.org/file19962/baikie-hwundram-v5.diff ? It's
basically complete IIRC. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-05-23 18:56:30 | baikie | set | recipients:
+ baikie, exarkun, pitrou, therve, vstinner, jackdied, giampaolo.rodola, synapse, Andrew.Grover, wiml, neologix, rosslagerwall, brian |
2011-05-23 18:56:29 | baikie | link | issue6560 messages |
2011-05-23 18:56:29 | baikie | create | |
|