Message136620
> Oh, Linux 2.6.27+ has a SOCK_CLOEXEC option:
It's not exactly the same thing.
We want to close the socket right after fork, not wait until exec (in the OP case there was no exec).
> Patch looks fine to me. Is it easily testable?
Easily, no. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-05-23 12:14:22 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, pitrou, vstinner, ryan003, victorpoluceno |
2011-05-23 12:14:22 | neologix | set | messageid: <1306152862.21.0.798153120568.issue5715@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-05-23 12:14:21 | neologix | link | issue5715 messages |
2011-05-23 12:14:21 | neologix | create | |
|