➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients benjamin.peterson, exarkun, facundobatista, gvanrossum, pitrou, rhettinger, vstinner
Date 2011-05-06.16:58:18
SpamBayes Score 0.00013995038
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1304701096.3520.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1304621159.79.0.814665093364.issue6116@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
Le jeudi 05 mai 2011 à 18:45 +0000, Facundo Batista a écrit :
> 
> Antoine, to see if I understood correctly... if we build the dict, and
> just return it but don't save it in the frame, this leak would be
> solved? (yes, it'd be slower because everytime it's asked, it'd need
> to be built again)

I would let Jean-Paul confirm the answer, but: yes.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-05-06 16:58:19pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, rhettinger, facundobatista, exarkun, vstinner, benjamin.peterson
2011-05-06 16:58:18pitroulinkissue6116 messages
2011-05-06 16:58:18pitroucreate