Message 135229 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	facundobatista
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, exarkun, facundobatista, gvanrossum, pitrou, rhettinger, vstinner
Date	2011-05-05.18:45:59
SpamBayes Score	0.0012768668
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1304621159.79.0.814665093364.issue6116@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Antoine, to see if I understood correctly... if we build the dict, and just return it but don't save it in the frame, this leak would be solved? (yes, it'd be slower because everytime it's asked, it'd need to be built again)

Antoine, to see if I understood correctly... if we build the dict, and just return it but don't save it in the frame, this leak would be solved? (yes, it'd be slower because everytime it's asked, it'd need to be built again)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-05-05 18:45:59	facundobatista	set	recipients: + facundobatista, gvanrossum, rhettinger, exarkun, pitrou, vstinner, benjamin.peterson
2011-05-05 18:45:59	facundobatista	set	messageid: <1304621159.79.0.814665093364.issue6116@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-05-05 18:45:59	facundobatista	link	issue6116 messages
2011-05-05 18:45:59	facundobatista	create